How can a debater show the impact of their argument to the audience?

A debater can effectively show the impact of their argument to the audience by illustrating its relevance to the opponent's case. This strategy connects their argument directly to the context of the ongoing debate, demonstrating how it not only stands on its own but also has significant implications for the opposing team's points. By doing so, the debater makes it clear why their argument matters in the broader discussion, potentially undermining the opponent's position while strengthening their own.

This connection creates a clearer understanding for the audience about why the argument is important, as it shows a direct opposition to what the opponent is advocating. This relevance enhances the persuasive power of the argument, making it more relatable and impactful for the judges and audience members, who may be swayed by how it affects the overall debate dynamics.

Emphasizing emotional appeal, while effective in certain contexts, does not always provide a logical connection to the opponent’s case and may not resonate with all segments of the audience. Making complex technical arguments can alienate listeners who may not grasp intricate details and can detract from the clarity and impact of the message. Finally, avoiding detailed explanations would reduce the persuasive quality of the argument, leaving the audience without a strong understanding of its significance. Thus, illustrating relevance to the opponent