How many smaller claims constitute a multiple argument?

A multiple argument is defined by its structure, which consists of at least two claims that are independent from each other. This means that each claim can stand alone and support the overall argument without relying on the other claims. This independent nature allows for a richer and more robust argument because it presents multiple lines of reasoning, enhancing the persuasive impact.

In contrast, a single main claim would only provide a singular perspective or point of view, lacking the depth that multiple independent claims offer. Dependent claims are those that rely on one another to support a single conclusion, and while they can be part of an argument, they do not constitute a multiple argument as they do not stand alone. Lastly, claims requiring evidence are a characteristic of many arguments but do not define the structure of a multiple argument itself; multiple arguments can include both claims requiring evidence and those that do not.

Thus, the defining feature of a multiple argument is its composition of at least two independent claims, making this the correct understanding of the concept.