Name three styles of debate commonly practiced.

The selection of Lincoln-Douglas, Policy, and Public Forum as styles of debate is indeed accurate. Each of these formats has distinct characteristics and purposes, making them essential to the realm of competitive debate.

Lincoln-Douglas debate focuses on moral and ethical issues, where typically one debater argues for a resolution while the other opposes it. This style emphasizes philosophical reasoning and the value of individual conscience.

Policy debate, on the other hand, revolves around advocating for and against specific policy changes, often involving detailed research and evidence to support claims about the practicality and necessity of the proposed policies. This format typically features two teams of two debaters each, necessitating in-depth knowledge and strategic argumentation.

Public Forum debate aims to engage the general public, emphasizing the clarity of arguments and accessibility of the topics. It features two teams of two speakers who debate a resolution that is often relevant to current events. This format encourages effective communication and the ability to appeal to a broader audience.

Engagement in these styles of debate helps participants develop crucial skills such as critical thinking, public speaking, and the ability to construct coherent arguments. Each style serves its unique purpose within the debate community, catering to different interests and skill sets among participants.