What do stock issues primarily address in a policy debate?

Stock issues in a policy debate specifically refer to a set of criteria that must be addressed by the affirmative team to establish a compelling case for policy change. These criteria include harm, which highlights the problems that currently exist; need, which shows why the change is necessary; inherency, which explains why the current system is incapable of solving the identified harms; solvency, which presents a viable plan capable of resolving the existing issues; and advantages, which outline the benefits of adopting the proposed policy.

By addressing these stock issues, debaters ensure that they are thoroughly examining the implications of a policy proposal. This framework not only helps in crafting a well-rounded argument but also assists judges in evaluating the effectiveness of the affirmative case. Engaging with these components allows for a comprehensive understanding of both the necessity for a change and the potential impacts of that change, making it essential in policy debate contexts.