What is a common characteristic of both ‘structural’ and ‘attitudinal’ inherency?

The common characteristic of both structural and attitudinal inherency is that they highlight obstacles to change.

Structural inherency refers to the limitations and barriers present within the existing systems or structures that prevent adequate solutions from being implemented. For instance, laws, policies, and institutional practices can be rigid, making it difficult to enact new ideas or reforms.

On the other hand, attitudinal inherency focuses on the beliefs, values, and mindsets of individuals or groups that can obstruct progress. These impediments are often more psychological or cultural in nature, affecting how people perceive issues and the willingness to embrace change.

Both types of inherency underscore that there are significant challenges—whether systemic or attitudinal—that need to be addressed in order to implement effective solutions. Recognizing these barriers is crucial for debate participants who argue for a change, as it allows them to tailor their arguments to confront the specific obstacles associated with either structural or attitudinal issues.