Which argument structure supports another argument and forms a chain of reasoning?

The argument structure that supports another argument and forms a chain of reasoning is the subordinative structure. This type of structure is characterized by the way one argument or premise is dependent on or builds upon another. In a subordinative argument, the relationships between the premises and the conclusion are hierarchical, where one argument acts as a foundation for another. This allows for a logical progression of ideas, where each subsequent argument is supported by the previous one.

For instance, in a chain of reasoning that begins with a broad claim, the subordinative arguments would provide the necessary premises or evidence that lead to the conclusion, establishing a clear line of thought. This contrasts with other structures like coordinative, where arguments are presented as equal and independent, without a hierarchical dependence. Multiple structures involve several arguments that can stand alone or support one another, but they do not inherently form a sequential chain. Implied structures rely on suggestions rather than explicit support, making them less direct in establishing connections. Therefore, in the context of chaining arguments together in a logical manner, the subordinative structure is the most effective choice.