Which of the following is NOT part of the evidence tests described?

The concept of evidence tests in public debate focuses on evaluating the quality and reliability of the evidence presented in support of arguments. Accessibility, recency, and credibility are all integral components used to assess evidence.

Accessibility relates to how readily available or understandable the information is to the audience. It ensures that the evidence can be verified and is not obscure or overly complex for the listeners.

Recency refers to the timeliness of the evidence. In debates, newer evidence is often more relevant and impactful, as it reflects the most current information available, thus providing weight to the argument being made.

Credibility addresses the trustworthiness of the source providing the evidence. High credibility indicates that the information is likely to be accurate and reliable, lending support to the argument presented.

In contrast, personal opinion does not meet the standards of objective evidence. It reflects an individual's subjective interpretation rather than empirical data or factual information. This makes it unsuitable for rigorous debate standards that require substantiated claims rather than subjective viewpoints. Thus, personal opinion stands out as not being part of the established evidence tests in public debates.