Which type of argument requires each argument to depend on the others?

The choice of subordinative arguments is correct because this type of argument structure is characterized by a hierarchy where each argument is dependent on the main claim and is supported by the arguments that precede it. In a subordinative framework, the validity or strength of the overall argument relies heavily on the interplay among its components; if one supporting argument fails, it compromises the entire structure. This creates a logical dependency that is essential to understanding how the arguments interact and support the central thesis.

In contrast, multiple arguments can stand alone; they provide independent support and do not necessitate reliance on one another. Coordinative arguments also present claims of equal weight or importance, functioning separately from each other. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for constructing coherent and logically sound arguments, particularly in a debate setting.