Who typically holds the burden of proof in a debate?

In a debate, the burden of proof is typically on the side proposing the affirmative. This means that the team or individual advocating for a change or an assertion must provide sufficient evidence and arguments to support their stance. The rationale behind this is rooted in the principle that it is easier to maintain the status quo than to advocate for change.

When one side is proposing a new idea, policy, or belief, they must justify why this change is necessary and beneficial, demonstrating why their position should be accepted over the current understanding or situation. This is often viewed as a responsibility to convince the audience or judges of the validity of their claim. Therefore, the burden of proof naturally falls on those making the claim that something should be different rather than on those defending what already exists.

In contrast, the other options suggest different distributions of the burden of proof, but in standard debate formats, it is primarily the affirmative side that must substantiate their position.