Why is it important for the negative to mix and match different attacks?

Mixing and matching different attacks allows the negative to create a more well-rounded and dynamic defense against the affirmative's claims. By not focusing too much on one argument, the negative can address various aspects of the affirmative case, which helps to present a comprehensive critique. This strategy encourages the evaluators to consider multiple perspectives and weaknesses in the affirmative case rather than getting locked onto a single point.

This approach also prevents the affirmative from easily countering a singular argument, thereby keeping the debate fluid and challenging. It emphasizes the negative's adaptability and resourcefulness, which can be advantageous in persuading the audience. Moreover, a varied strategy can make the negative case more engaging and nuanced, increasing its persuasiveness.

In contrast, focusing voraciously on one argument could lead to a lack of depth in the debate, leaving other potential weaknesses unaddressed and allowing the affirmative to prepare stronger rebuttals on that specific point.